Public Company M&A in the Insurance Sector—Current Legal and Strategic Issues Spring 2017
View Client Update
Key takeaways
- Of the 10 largest recently-announced public insurance M&A deals, eight were ultimately all-cash deals and nine involved a buyer that might once have been considered non-traditional.
- Because choosing non-traditional buyers is risky, seller boards sometimes conducted a “reverse” due diligence process to determine if the buyer had the financial resources to consummate the transaction or the sophistication to obtain the necessary regulatory approvals.
- Regulatory risk was sometimes allocated in the terms of the definitive agreement – whether by negotiating a form of regulatory reverse termination fee or by defining the burdensome regulatory conditions that a buyer would not be contractually obligated to accept.
- Seller boards are satisfying their fiduciary duties to seek the best price for the target company through a mix of pre- and/or post-signing market checks.